Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Don't feed the bears

The BBC reports on a new and somewhat frightening study on emerging infectious diseases worldwide. Researchers from the Zoological Society of London (ZSL), and University of Georgia and Columbia University's Earth Institute analysed 335 emerging diseases from 1940 to 2004. Using computer models, they attempted to correlate emerging diseases with human population density or changes, latitude, rainfall or wildlife biodiversity, and then plotted the 'hotspots' for disease emergence on a global map. One surprise was the location of the hotspots. Instead of arising in northern industrialized nations -- with its better surveillance systems and (over)use of antibiotics -- new infectious diseases tended to spring from tropical Africa, Latin America and Southeast Asia. Another surprise is that the majority of emergent diseases are zoonotic pathogens, i.e. pathogens that leapt from animals to humans, and that of these zoonotic diseases, 72% came from wildlife, not domesticated animals. As we increase the earth's population, and increasingly encroach on wilderness areas, the probability of zoonotic transmission increases; once the pathogen has made the leap from animal to man, it then can spread fairly rapidly by international travel and trade. The SARS epidemic -- likely originating from horseshoe bats in rapidly industrializing China -- is a paradigm case for the future emerging epidemics.

Hopefully the results of the study will enable us to predict outbreaks. Now we only need to work on the man-made causes of these outbreaks, and the global inequalities in capacity to respond to the infectious disease epidemics that we partly dish out to ourselves.

Labels: ,


Blogger Sam said...

Is the contact with animals increasing as the population grows? It is not hard to imagine some the diseases in the study like ebola might have been in and out of isolated human populations for a long time before causing an outbreak with human populations large enough and conected enough to the outside world to be noticed. Mostly as the population grows people live in cities or at least agrocultural areas cut off from contact with wild animals.

7:37 PM  
Blogger Stuart Rennie, Editor said...

Hi Sam, thanks for the comment. I have also heard similar theories about certain diseases being first prevalent only in isolated communities -- themselves close to wild animal life -- and only spreading more widely only decades later. HIV seems to have been transmitted from monkeys to man, and may have been around as early as 1930. Human mobility and technological advances (like roads) seem to carry the diseases due to zoonotic transmission into non-rural or wilderness areas. The idea seems to be: once those diseases have made made the jump from animal to man, you don't have to live in areas with direct contact with wild animals to be infected by them.

10:36 PM  
Blogger Zheng junxai5 said...

2015-10-13 zhengjx
ugg boots
ugg boots
Ray Ban Sunglasses Outlet Store Online
coach factory outlet
toms outlet
coach factory outlet online
Abercrombie & Fitch Clothing With Big Discount
Cheap Jordan 13 Shoes For Sale Free Shipping
Ugg Boots,Ugg Boots Outlet,Ugg Outlet,Cheap Uggs,Uggs On Sale,Ugg Boots Clearance,Uggs For Women
Louis Vuitton Outlet Handbags Pursers In USA
michael kors handbags
ugg boots sale
ralph lauren
louis vuitton
Kobe Shoes,Kobe 9,Kobe 8 Discount
Mont Blanc Pens For Sale
Cheap Michael Kors Handbags On Sale
Christian Louboutin Outlet For Women
Cheap Louis Vuitton Handbags Luggage Bags Sale
michael kors outlet
abercrombie & fitch
coach outlet store online
Louis Vuitton Outlet Authentic Handbags Discount
Hollister UK Clothing Store
canada goose
michale kors outlet
Christian Louboutin Shoes Outlet Sale Cheap Price
Canada Goose,Canada Goose Outlet,Canada Goose Jackets,Canada Goose Sale
Cheap Jordans Shoes For Sale

8:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home